برررسی رابطه تکنو استرس بر مشغولیت تحصیلی با نقش میانجی خستگی حاصل از فناوری در دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

2 دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر تکنو استرس بر درگیری تحصیلی با نقش میانجی خستگی تکنولوژیکی در یادگیری آنلاین دانشجویان بود. طرح پژوهش حاضر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است که در آن روابط ساختاری میان متغیرهای پژوهش با استفاده از مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز در سال تحصیلی 1403-1402 بود که از بین آن‌ها 389 نفر (205 زن و 184 مرد)، با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی نسبتی، انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامه‌های تکنو استرس، درگیری تحصیلی و خستگی تکنولوژیکی پاسخ دادند. برای تحلیل داده‌های آمار توصیفی و ماتریس همبستگی از نرم افزار SPSS (نسخه 25) و برای آزمون فرضیه و مدل پژوهش از نرم افزار AMOS (نسخه 20) استفاده شد که نشان از برازش مطلوب مدل به دست آمده بود. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از این است که تکنواسترس تاثیر مثبت و معنی داری بر درگیری تحصیلی دارد. از طرف دیگر، خستگی تکنولوژیکی تاثیر منفی و معنی داری بر درگیری تحصیلی دارد. هم چنین تکنواسترس تاثیر منفی و معنی داری بر خستگی تکنولوژیکی دارد. بر اساس یافته های به دست آمده از پژوهش می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که برای افزایش سطح درگیری تحصیلی و بهبود عملکرد تحصیلی باید به عوامل و ابعاد تکنواسترس و خستگی تکنولوژیکی بر روی فراگیران توجه کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences11(1), 24.
Al Mulhım, E. N. (2023). Technology fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of distance project-based learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education24(1), 234-245.
Allen, K. A., & Kern, M. L. (2017). School belonging in adolescents: Theory, research and practice. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: an overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualizations. International Education Studies9(12), 41-52.
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology12, 713057.
Anand, M. S. S., & Jethwani, M. L. M. (2023). Teacher Fatigue and Student Motivation in Online Learning Environments among Young Adults. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy11(3).
Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS quarterly, 831-858.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology52(1), 1-26.
Berger, M., Schäfer, R., Schmidt, M., Regal, C., & Gimpel, H. (2023). How to prevent technostress at the digital workplace: a Delphi study. Journal of Business Economics, 1-63.
Bondanini, G., Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Andreucci-Annunziata, P. (2020). Technostress dark side of technology in the workplace: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(21), 8013.
Boonjing, V., & Chanvarasuth, P. (2017). Risk of overusing mobile phones: Technostress effect. Procedia computer science111, 196-202.
Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How are techno-stressors associated with mental health and work outcomes? A systematic review of occupational exposure to information and communication technologies within the technostress model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(16), 8673.
Brady, L., & Cunningham, C. J. (2019). Challenge, hindrance, and threat stressors: A within-and between-persons examination of general and specific stressor appraisal tendencies and a priori categorizations.
Cho, S. Y., & Im, T. (2024). The structural relationships among online class related factors, zoom fatigue, learning engagement, perceived achievement, and class satisfaction in university online classes. Education and Information Technologies, 1-17.
Chuan, C. L., & Penyelidikan, J. (2006). Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: A comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL7(1), 78-86.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology1(20), 416-436.
Dehghanan, H., Ahmadi, M. M., & Alizadeh, A. (2015). The effect of psychological characteristics on the formation of technology stress (case study: smartphone users). Media Studies, 10(28), 9-24. [In Persian]
Derakhshan, A. (2021). The predictability of Turkman students’ academic engagement through Persian language teachers’ nonverbal immediacy and credibility. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages10(1), 3-24.
Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., A Parris, M., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education83(2), 317-338.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research74(1), 59-109.
Froment, F., & Gutiérrez, M. D. B. (2022). The prediction of teacher credibility on student motivation: Academic engagement and satisfaction as mediating variables. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.)27(2), 149-157.
Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review31(3), 328-349.
Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2020). Technology fatigue of faculty in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice11(18).
Harunavamwe, M., & Kanengoni, H. (2023). Hybrid and virtual work settings; the interaction between technostress, perceived organisational support, work-family conflict and the impact on work engagement. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, (ahead-of-print).
Heckman, B. W., Mathew, A. R., & Carpenter, M. J. (2015). Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health. Current opinion in psychology5, 31-36.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education18(1), 25.
Heinrich, D. G., McAndrew, I., & Pretty, J. (2022). Attention, concentration, and fatigue in space operations environments. International Journal of Applied Technology & Leadership1(2), 1-13.
Hilty, D. M., Armstrong, C. M., Smout, S. A., Crawford, A., Maheu, M. M., Drude, K. P., ... & Krupinski, E. A. (2022). Findings and guidelines on provider technology, fatigue, and well-being: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research24(5), e34451.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping127, 147.
Hughes, N. (2023). Student engagement, pedagogical imaginaries and the future of arts and humanities teaching and learning in higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education22(1), 81-99.
Kahol, K., Leyba, M. J., Deka, M., Deka, V., Mayes, S., Smith, M., ... & Panchanathan, S. (2008). Effect of fatigue on psychomotor and cognitive skills. The American Journal of Surgery195(2), 195-204.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Lee, A. R., Son, S. M., & Kim, K. K. (2016). Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: A stress perspective. Computers in human behavior55, 51-61.
Lee, Y. K., Chang, C. T., Lin, Y., & Cheng, Z. H. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in human behavior31, 373-383.
Lottin, J., Alzahmi, E., Wiseman, A., Sukker, H., Eltoum, M., Alayyan, M., ... & Anand, A. (2021, November). Reduce academic fatigue and enhance retention for the determined ones (TDOs) in online learning. In 2021 Sustainable Leadership and Academic Excellence International Conference (SLAE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Ma, Q., & Wang, F. (2022). The role of students’ spiritual intelligence in enhancing their academic engagement: A theoretical review. Frontiers in psychology13, 857842.
Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Cocoradă, E., Dovleac, L., Lixăndroiu, R. C., Maican, M. A., & Cocoradă, S. A. (2024). The role of contextual and individual factors in successful e-learning experiences during and after the pandemic–a two-year study. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-36.
Mamani-Benito, O., Esteban, R. F. C., Huayta-Meza, M. V., Castillo-Blanco, R., Chaparro, J. E. T., & Morales Garcia, W. C. (2024, March). Emotional fatigue, academic engagement, and satisfaction with studies during the return to post-pandemic university attendance. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1297302). Frontiers Media SA.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications.
Mohanna, S., Talepasand, S., & Rostami, S. (2020). Educational identity, internal motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of deep cognitive engagement. Journal of Research in Educational Science14(48), 7-22.
Nimrod, G. (2018). Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging & mental health22(8), 1086-1093.
Nisafani, A. S., Kiely, G., & Mahony, C. (2020). Workers’ technostress: A review of its causes, strains, inhibitors, and impacts. Journal of Decision Systems29(sup1), 243-258.
O'Regan, C., Walsh, N., Hall, T., Mannion, G., & Millar, M. (2023). Conceptualizing student engagement as a theoretical framework for innovative higher education practices: a literature review. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education15(2).
Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research57(8), 2006-2031.
Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research policy50(1), 104114
Pham, T. T. H., Ho, T. T. Q., Nguyen, B. T. N., Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, T. H. (2024). Academic motivation and academic satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of academic engagement and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
Pinquart, M., & Ebeling, M. (2020). Parental educational expectations and academic achievement in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review32(2), 463-480.
Rafatjoo, Z. (2022). Structural model of relationship between digital informal learning, task value, academic hardiness and academic engagement with students' academic performance in online education (Master's thesis). Shiraz University. [In Persian]
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information systems research19(4), 417-433.
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology48(3), 422-436.
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology53(3), 593-619.
Saleem, F., Malik, M. I., Qureshi, S. S., Farid, M. F., & Qamar, S. (2021). Technostress and employee performance nexus during COVID-19: training and creative self-efficacy as moderators. Frontiers in Psychology12, 595119.
Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Journal of Educational Technology & Society8(4), 205-219.
Satuti, J. R., Sunaryanto, S., & Nuris, D. M. R. (2020). Does Student Satisfaction Mediate the Correlation between E-learning Service Quality, Academic Engagement and Academic Achievement?. Journal of Accounting and Business Education5(1), 38-53.
Sethi, D., Pereira, V., & Arya, V. (2021). Effect of technostress on academic productivity: E-engagement through persuasive communication. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM)30(5), 1-19.
Shochat, T. (2012). Impact of lifestyle and technology developments on sleep. Nature and Science of Sleep, 19-31.
Spencer, R., Sinno, J., Hatfield, K., Biderman, M., Doria, N., & Numer, M. (2020). Exploring top hat’s impact on undergraduate students’ belongingness, engagement, and self-confidence: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education52(2), 197-215.
Suharti, L., & Susanto, A. (2014). The impact of workload and technology competence on technostress and performance of employees. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies5(2), 01-07.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems24(1), 301-328.
Tomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Alberola, S., & Georgieva, S. (2022). Psychometric properties of two major approaches to measure school engagement in university students. Current Psychology41(5), 2654-2667.
Tu, Q., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2008). Improving end-user satisfaction through techno-stress prevention: some empirical evidences. AMCIS 2008 proceedings, 236.
Vallone, F., Galvin, J., Cattaneo Della Volta, M. F., Akhtar, A., Chua, S., Ghio, E., ... & Zurlo, M. C. (2023). Technostress and academic motivation: direct and indirect effects on university students' psychological health. Frontiers in psychology14, 1211134.
Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (2018). Lev Vygotsky: Learning and social constructivism. Learning Theories for Early Years Practice. UK: SAGE Publications Inc, 68-73.
Wang, F., & Ye, Z. (2021). On the role of EFL/ESL teachers' emotion regulation in students' academic engagement. Frontiers in Psychology12, 758860.
Wang, J., Bu, L., Li, Y., Song, J., & Li, N. (2021). The mediating effect of academic engagement between psychological capital and academic burnout among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today102, 104938.
Wang, M. T., Binning, K. R., Del Toro, J., Qin, X., & Zepeda, C. D. (2021). Skill, thrill, and will: The role of metacognition, interest, and self‐control in predicting student engagement in mathematics learning over time. Child Development92(4), 1369-1387.
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review34(1), 107-138.
Xie, J. L., Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. (2008). Theories of job stress and the role of traditional values: a longitudinal study in China. Journal of Applied Psychology93(4), 831.
Yang, J., Xu, J., & Zhang, H. (2022). Resiliency and academic engagement: A moderated mediation model. Psychology in the Schools59(5), 900-914.
Yener, S., Arslan, A., & Kilinç, S. (2021). The moderating roles of technological self-efficacy and time management in the technostress and employee performance relationship through burnout. Information Technology & People34(7), 1890-1919.
Yu, Z., Gao, M., & Wang, L. (2021). The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research59(3), 522-546.
Zheng, M., Asif, M., Tufail, M. S., Naseer, S., Khokhar, S. G., Chen, X., & Naveed, R. T. (2022). Covid academic pandemic: Techno stress faced by teaching staff for online academic activities. Frontiers in Psychology13, 895371.
Zilvinskis, J., Rocconi, L. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2021). Does teaching count? The relationship between US News World Report faculty resource measures and students experiences with faculty. In E. Hazelkorn & G. Mihut (Eds.), Research Handbook on University Rankings (pp. 320-328). Edward Elgar Publishing.