رابطه ادراک از محیط سازنده‌گرا و عملکرد تحصیلی: نقش میانجی یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، کرج، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد خرم آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرم آباد، ایران.

3 استادیار، عضو هیئت علمی سازمان پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه ادراک محیط سازنده­گرا و عملکرد تحصیلی با نقش واسطه‌ای یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی در دانش‌آموزان پایه دوزادهم بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی-همبستگی بود. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی مدارس دوره دوم متوسطه شهر قم به تعداد 91 مدرسه در سال تحصیلی 1402-1401 بود که تعداد 6542 دانش‌آموز را دربرمی‌گرفتند. برای انتخاب نمونه از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای استفاده شد. به این صورت که از هریک از مناطق چهارگانه آموزشی شهر قم 2 مدرسه و از هر مدرسه هم 3 کلاس و در مجموع 24 کلاس با 427 دانش‌آموز (209 پسر و 218 دختر) انتخاب شدند و به ابزار‌های عملکرد تحصیلی، محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا­، آمادگی یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی پاسخ دادند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از روش مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که مسیر مستقیم ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده­گرا، یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی به عملکرد تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان ازنظر آماری مثبت و معنی‌دار بود. همچنین، رابطه ادراک محیط سازنده­گرا با عملکرد تحصیلی از طریق نقش میانجی یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی مثبت و معنی‌دار بود. بنابراین، با توجه به یافته‌های پژوهش مبنی‌بر اثرگذاری ادراک محیط سازنده‌گرا بر عملکرد تحصیلی از طریق نقش میانجی یادگیری خودراهبر و درگیری تحصیلی می­توان پیشنهاد کرد معلمان و برنامه­ریزان آموزشی از این رویکرد در جهت افزایش بهره­وری آموزشی و ارتقای سطح عملکرد دانش آموزان استفاده کنند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Abdi, A., & Shiravand, B. (2023). Development of a mathematical performance model based on constructivist learning environment perceptions with the mediating role of mathematical self-efficacy and motivation to learn mathematic in first grade high school students. Educational Psychology, 18(66), 217-242. DOI: 10.22054/jep.2023.64467.3511 [In Persian]
Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22), 1074-1079 DOI: 10.5897/ERR2017.3298
Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392-398. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040211
Aldridge, J. M., & Rowntree, K. (2022). Investigating relationships between learning environment perceptions, motivation and self-regulation for female science students in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Research in Science Education52(5), 1545-1564. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-021-09998-2
Alizadeh, S., & Yahak, E. (2023). Explain the mediating role of self-directed learning in the relationship between metacognitive beliefs and academic procrastination of high school students. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 16(61), 75-95. Doi: 10.30495/jinev.2023.1978865.2834 [In Persian]
Al-Rahmi, W., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). The role of social media for collaborative learning to improve academic performance of students and researchers in Malaysian higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning16(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl. v16i4.2326
Azma, F., Golchin, R., & Nouri, M. (2021). Investigating the role of social media use and academic engagement on academic performance of athletic students. Sport Psychology Studies, 10(37), 69-84. DOI: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.8476.1919 [In Persian]
Barzegar Bafrooei, K., & Sheykholeslami, A. (2014). Psychometric characteristics of constructivist learning environment questionnaire. Journal of School Psychology, 2(4), 170-174. DOI: d_2_1_92_12_18_1 [In Persian]
Batool, S., Rashid, J., Nisar, M. W., Kim, J., Kwon, H. Y., & Hussain, A. (2023). Educational data mining to predict students' academic performance: A survey study. Education and Information Technologies28(1), 905-971. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11152-y
Bizimana, E., Mutangana, D., & Mwesigye, A. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the classroom learning environment and engagement in cooperative mastery learning-based biology classroom instruction. Education Research International2022(2), 1-14. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5793394
Boshagh, M. R (2015). Structural equation modeling in humanities: AMOS 22. Tehran, Sociologists publications. [In Persian]
Boz, Y., Yerdelen-Damar, S., Aydemir, N., & Aydemir, M. (2016). Investigating the relationships among students’ self-efficacy beliefs, their perceptions of classroom learning environment, gender, and chemistry achievement through structural equation modeling. Research in Science & Technological Education34(3), 307-324. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2016.1174931
Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2019). How do sources of self-efficacy predict preservice teachers’ beliefs related to constructivist and traditional approaches to teaching and learning? Sage Open9(4), 2158244019885125. DOI: 10.1177/2158244019885125
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1099-1120). National Association of School Psychologists.
Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2022). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning Environments Research, 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2
Collier, C. (2022). Self-directed learning: Historical and theoretical arguments for learner Led Education. Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2022. https://doi.org/10.57709/25841999
Demir, M., & Metin, K. A. Y. A. (2022). Analysis of constructivist learning model’s effects on student outcomes: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science15(4), 938-957. DOI: 10.30831/akukeg.1122136
Do, H. N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The design science approach. Heliyon, 9(12). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2023.e22862
Dortaj, F. (2005). Investigating the effect of process and product mental simulation on improving the academic performance of students, creating and validating the academic performance test (Doctoral dissertation). Allameh Tabataba’i University. [In Persian]
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today21(7), 516-525. DOI: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Garavand, Y., Omidian, M., Farhadirad, H., Razavi, S. A., & Maktabi, G. (2021). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of constructivist approach-based education on academic performance in the experimental science course. Research in Curriculum Planning, 18(69), 94-112. DOI: 10.30486/jsre.2021.1898821.1639 [In Persian]
Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly42(3), 136-148. DOI: 10.1177/074171369204200302
Ghasemi, V. (2010). Structural equation modeling in social studies using Amos Graphics. Tehran: Sociologists. [In Persian]
Harjali, H. (2019). Building constructivist learning environment at senior high school in Indonesia. Qualitative Report24(9). DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4001
Khalid, M., Bashir, S., & Amin, H. (2020). Relationship between self-directed learning (SDL) and academic achievement of university students: A case of online distance learning and traditional universities. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 131-148.
Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2011). The power of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills; Preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 317-329.
Kingir, S., Tas, Y., Gok, G., & Vural, S. S. (2013). Relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, motivational beliefs, self-regulation and science achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 205-226.
Kruger, B., Hegele, M., & Rieger, M. (2022). The multisensory nature of human action imagery. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. DOI: 10.1007/S00426-022-01771-y
Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2017). University English language learners' readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System67, 99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.05.001
Li, J., Yang, D., & Hu, Z. (2022). Wuhan College students’ self-directed learning and academic performance: Chain-mediating roles of optimism and mental health. Frontiers in Psychology12, 757496. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757496
Li, L., Chen, X., & Li, H. (2020). Bullying victimization, school belonging, academic engagement and achievement in adolescents in rural China: A serial mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review113, 104946. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104946
Limniou, M., Sedghi, N., Kumari, D., & Drousiotis, E. (2022). Student engagement, learning environments and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison between psychology and engineering undergraduate students in the UK. Education Sciences12(10), 671. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12100671
Liu, K., Yao, J., Tao, D., & Yang, T. (2023). Influence of individual-technology-task-environment fit on university student online learning performance: The mediating role of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 1-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-11833-2
Loyens, S. M., Rikers, R. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Relationships between students’ conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies. Instructional Science, 36, 445-462.
Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & H. Iksan, Z. (2021). The influence of student engagement on mathematical achievement among secondary school students. Mathematics10(1), 41. DOI: 10.3390/math10010041
Mantooth, R., Usher, E. L., & Love, A. M. (2021). Changing classrooms bring new questions: Environmental influences, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Learning Environments Research24, 519-535. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-020-09341-y
Marlina, E., Tjahjadi, B., & Ningsih, S. (2021). Factors affecting student performance in e-learning: A case study of higher educational institutions in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business8(4), 993-1001. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0993
Martínez, I. M., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., Chambel, M. J., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019). Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology39(8), 1047-1067. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications.
Monteiro, E., Donham, A., & Klaib, M. (2022). Teacher characteristics and ADHD intervention outcomes in schools. Educational Research, 64(3), 257-276.‏ DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2022.2087711
Morovati, Z., Shehni Yailagh, M., Mehrabizadeh Honarmand, M., & Kianpoor Ghahfarokhi, F. (2013). The casual relationship between perceived constructive learning environment and mathematics performance with mediating role of intrinsic goal orientation, task value, attitude toward mathematics and mathematics self efficacy of male junior high school students in Ahvaz. Psychological Achievements, 20(1), 91-122. [In Persian]
Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education65(4), 633-653. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2
Moubayed, A., Injadat, M., Shami, A., & Lutfiyya, H. (2020). Student engagement level in an e-learning environment: Clustering using k-means. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(2), 137-156.
Nadi, M. A., & Sajjadian, I. (2012). Investigating validity and reliability of guglielminos self-directed learning readiness scale (SDLRS) among medical and dentistry students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 12(6), 467-479. [In Persian]
Ngah, R., Junid, J., & Osman, C. A. (2019). The links between role of educators, selfdirected learning, constructivist learning environment and entrepreneurial endeavor: Technology entrepreneurship pedagogical approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 414-427. DIO: 10.26803/ijlter.18.11.25
Pham, L. B. & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulltein, 25(2), 250-260. DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025002010
Phillips, N., & Lindsay, G. (2006). Motivation in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 57-73.
Ramazani, M., & Khamesan, A. (2017). Psychometric characteristics of Reeve’s academic engagement questionnaire 2013: With the introduction of the agentic engagement. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 8(29), 185-204. DOI: 10.22054/jem.2018.22660.1555 [In Persian]
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595. DOI: 10.1037/a0032690
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology36(4), 257-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Sawatsky, A. P., Ratelle, J. T., Bonnes, S. L., Egginton, J. S., & Beckman, T. J. (2017). A model of self-directed learning in internal medicine residency: A qualitative study using grounded theory. BMC Medical Education17(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0869-4
Sawers, K. M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L., & Copeland, R. (2016). What drives student engagement: is it learning space, instructor behavior or teaching philosophy? Journal of Learning Spaces5(2), 26-38.
Senjaya, P., Kotamena, F., Ong, F., Andika, C. B., Purwanto, A., & Pramono, R. (2020). School environmental influences, student discipline and learning motivation toward increasing senior high students’ achievement. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology29(05), 4572-4586.
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1-13.
Sokmen, Y., & Kilic, D. (2019). The relationship between primary school teachers' self-efficacy, autonomy, job satisfaction, teacher engagement and burnout: A model development study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science5(2), 709-721. DOI: 10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
Sze-Yeng, F., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Self-directed learning in a socioconstructivist learning environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1913-1917. DIO.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.423
Taylor, P., Dawson, V., & Fraser, B. (1995). A constructivist perspective on monitoring classroom learning environments under transformation. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research association, San Francisco, CA.
Tiilikainen, M., Karjalainen, J., Toom, A., Lepola, J., & Husu, J. (2019). The complex zone of constructivist teaching: a multi-case exploration in primary classrooms. Research Papers in Education34(1), 38-60. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2017.1402080
Tu, X. (2021). The role of classroom culture and psychological safety in EFL students' engagement. Frontiers in Psychology12, 760903. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760903
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction28, 12-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Wei, L. S., & Elias, H. (2011). Relationship between students' perceptions of classroom enviroment and their motivation in learning English language. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(21), 240-250.
Wu, L., Hsieh, P. J., & Wu, S. M. (2022). Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement. The Internet and Higher Education55, 100871. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100871