کاوش مؤلفه‌های اثربخش در تدریس نوآورانه اساتید در فضای مجازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 استادیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 دانشیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

10.22099/jsli.2023.7188

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش کاوش مؤلفه‌های اثربخش در تدریس نوآورانه اساتید در فضای مجازی بود. روش پژوهش از نوع کیفی است و اعضای هیئت‌علمی نمونه و موفق در تدریس دانشگاه شیراز در سال 1400 که تجربه برگزاری کلاس درس با استفاده از روش‌های خلاق و نوآورانه در فضای مجازی را داشتند، به‌عنوان مشارکت‌کنندگان بالقوه در نظر گرفته شدند. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و رویکرد اشباع نظری با 15 نفر مصاحبه انجام شد. داده ­های لازم استخراج و با  روش تحلیل مضمون مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و در نهایت مؤلفه‌های اثربخش در تدریس نوآورانه اساتید در فضای مجازی در قالب پنج مضمون سازمان‌دهنده سطح دوم و ده مضمون سازمان‌دهنده سطح اول و هشتاد و چهار مضمون پایه تدوین گردید. براساس یافته ­های پژوهش شایستگی دیجیتالی اساتید شامل دو مضمون سازمان‌دهنده شایستگی شخصیتی و شایستگی حرفه‌ای، در گیر ساختن دانشجویان  شامل دو مضمون سازمان‌دهنده علایق و تعاملات مجازی، محتوای مجازی شامل دو مضمون سازمان‌دهنده کیفیت محتوا و سازمان‌دهی محتوا، راهبردهای یاددهی - یادگیری مجازی شامل دو مضمون سازمان‌دهنده ساختاری (شیوه اجرا) و اجرای اثربخش و در نهایت بازخورد شامل دو مضمون سازمان‌دهنده ارزشیابی و بازخورد انگیزشی استاد بود. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که تدریس اثربخش در فضای مجازی مستلزم فراهم ساختن زیرساخت­ ها و بسترهای لازم خصوصاً فراهم ساختن زمینه‌های لازم جهت توسعه و بهسازی مهارت ­ها و شایستگی‌­های حرفه­ای، دیجیتالی و ارتباطی استادان براساس بسترهای مختلف آموزشی با هدف افزایش کیفیت انتقال دانش و ارتقای سطح علمی دانشجویان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Akbari, J., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual vs. non-virtual teaching in improving reading comprehension of Iranian undergraduate eflstudents. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 272-283.
Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 301-318.
Almusharraf, N., & Khahro, S. (2020). Students satisfaction with online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 246-267.‏
Ammari, E. (2013). Information and communication technology and the role of educational innovations in teaching chemistry. The 8th Iranian Chemistry Education Seminar, Faculty of Chemistry, Semnan University. [Persian]
Aslami. M., Esmaeili, Z. Saeidipour, B., & Sarmadi, M. R. (2018). Explaining the professional competencies of instructors in the e-learning environment. Education Strategies in Medical Science, 11(48), 16-23. Doi: 10.29252/edcbmj.11.02.03 [Persian]
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research1(3), 385-405.‏
Bailie, J. L. (2011). Effective online instructional competencies as perceived by online university faculty and students: A sequel study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 82-89. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12264/123.
Balanzá–Martínez, V., Atienza–Carbonell, B., Kapczinski, F., & De Boni, R. B. (2020). Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19–time to connect. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 141(5), 399-400. DOI: 10.1111/acps.13177. PMID: 32324252; PMCID: PMC7264786.
Barberà, E., Layne, L., & Gunawardena, C. N. (2018). Designing online interaction to address disciplinary competencies: A cross-country comparison of faculty perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(3), 142-169.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.‏
Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & De Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53-64.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.‏
Davidson, P. L. (2014). Student perspectives of future online faculty competencies: A qualitative descriptive study. IHART, 36(14), 316-326.
De La Torre, L., Guinaldo, M., Heradio, R., & Dormido, S. (2015). The ball and beam system: A case study of virtual and remote lab enhancement with moodle. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics11(4), 934-945.‏
Diehl, W. C. (2016). Online instructor and teaching competencies: Literature review for QualityMatters.Retrivedfrom(https://www.qualitymatters.org//sites/default/files/reserch-docs-pdfs/QM-OnlineInstructorTeachingCompetencies-lit-review-part-two.pdf.
Ernest, P., Guitert Catasús, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., & Stickler, U. (2013). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 311-333.
Esmaeili, M. R., Hozni, S. A., Mosazadeh, B., & Zavareh, A. (2017). Good teacher’s characteristics and its influence on Dental students academic motivation in Guilan Universtiy of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education, 9(3), 10-18. [Persian]
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. JRC Technical Note, 7(10), 52374-52389, 64.
Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. (2017). Representation the characteristics of the successful professors in the virtual education in Iran’s higher education system from the viewpoint of students and professors: A phenomenological study. Technology of Education Journal, 11(43), 235-255. [Persian]
Gulbahar, Y., & Kalelioglu, F. (2015). Competencies for e-Instructors: How to qualify and guarantee sustainability. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(2), 140-154.
Jayashree, R .(2017). A Study on Innovative Teaching Learning Methods for Undergraduate Students .International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention(IJHSSI), 6(11), 32-34.
Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-computer studies, 66(5), 356-369.
Kalyani, D., & Rajasekaran, K. (2018). Innovative teaching and learning. Journal of applied and advanced research3(1), 23-25.‏
Keykha, A., Haji Alian, N., Mohammadi Mehr, M., & Darabi, F. (2019). Analysis of good teacher’s features from Allameh Tabataba’i University students’ viewpoint. Journal of Educational Studies (NAMA), 7(2), 48-61. [Persian]
Khairnar, C. M. (2015). Advance pedagogy: Innovative methods of teaching and learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(11), 869.
Khodarahmi, M., Khosravi, M., & Abdolmaleki, S. (2019). Analysis and identification of key elements of innovative teaching: Innovative teaching of professors in higher education). Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(4), 1-23. [Persian]
Li, S., Zhang, J., Yu, C., & Chen, L. (2017). Rethinking distance tutoring in e-learning environments: A study of the priority of roles and competencies of Open University Tutors in China. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,  18(2), 189-212.
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205.
Moradi Doliskani, M., & Mohammadi Mehr, M.,  (2019). The relationship between personality traits and teaching quality among the faculty members of the AJA University of Medical Sciences from the students' viewpoint. Military Caring Sciences, 5(4), 273-281. [Persian]
Morrison, B., & Evans, S. (2018). University students’ conceptions of the good teacher: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(3), 352-365.
Najafi, H., Maleki, H., Farmahini Farahani, M., & Jafari Harandi, R. (2016). An Assessment of Faculty Members' Professional Ethics from Students' Viewpoint in Medical School of Shahed University. Journal of Medical Edcuation Development, 9 (21), 93-102. [Persian]
Najafi, H., Sobhaninejad, M., & Baghai, M. R. (2016). Investigating the application of teaching professional ethics among faculty members of Imam Khomeini University of Marine Sciences (RA) Nowshahr. Marine Science Education, 2(4), 1-16, [Persian]
Napal Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(3), 104.
Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15.
Ramezanpour, E., Pourkarimi, J., Fatemi, S. O., & Masoumi, D. (2021). Providing a Meta-Synthesis Model of Competencies of E-Learning Courses Instructors. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences11(4), 5-25. [Persian]
Rasal, M., & Suryawanshi, M. (2015). To study the various innovative methods of teaching for undergraduate level. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(8), 1966-1971.
Sabouri, S., & Alimardanzadeh, M. (2020). Exploring the possible effect of virtual education and face-to-face education methods on the score of Kerman pharmacy students. Iraninan Journal of Medical Education, 20, 35-42. [Persian]
Salarvand, S., Yamani, N., Kashani, F., Salarvand, M., Ataei, M., & Hashemi Fesharaki, M. (2016). Nursing students’ perception of ethical and professional characteristics of an ideal faculty member: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 15(60), 481-494. [Persian]
Salehi, N., Petersen, C., Hurley, S., Sherven, P., & Reilly, C. (2017). Creating Online Teaching Competencies and a Faculty Development Curriculum. Minnesota Summit on Learning & Technology, 4(8), 32-54.
Sangari, N. (2017). Developing the core competencies model of Islamic University faculty members (Case study: Al-Zahra University). Management of the Islamic University, 6(13), 45-60. [Persian]
Seraji, F., Movahedi, R., & Siahatkhah, M. (2014). An investigation of Iranian virtual universities teachers’ skills in teaching these courses. Technology of Education Journal, 8(4), 245-257. Doi: 10.22061/tej.2014.10 [Persian]
Shaikh, Z. A., & Khoja, S. A. (2014). Personal learning environments and university teacher roles explored using Delphi. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 202-226.
Tyrrell, R. (2015). Exploring the needs and perceptions of online faculty towards faculty professional development: A qualitative study. University of California, Los Angeles.
UNESCO. (2020). UNESCO Institute for Statistics data. Retrieved from: en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/coronavirus-schools-colours.
Vahabi, A. (2014). The characteristics of a good master from the viewpoint of students of Sanandaj University of Applied Science. Journal of Medical Education Development, 7(13), 82-90. [Persian]
Vig, P., & Sharma, K. (2014). Humane characteristics of teachers in relation to employability skills: A research study. International Journal of Education and Management Studies, 4(2), 79-80.
Watfa, M. K., & Audi, D. (2017). Innovative virtual and collaborative teaching methodologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(7), 663-673.
Wut, T. M., & Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: a social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review 22(3), 371-383.
Zhou, H., Liu, M., Zeng, J., & Zhu, J. (2016). Selection of nursing teaching strategies in mainland China: A questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today, 39, 147-151.
Zhu, C., & Wang, D. (2014). Key competencies and characteristics for innovative teaching among secondary school teachers: A mixed-methods research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 299-311.