Identifying the Dimensions and Skills Necessary for Effective Teaching in Virtual Education from University Professors' Perspective: A Phenomenological Study Using the Giorgi Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Introduction: The use of virtual education and digital tools in the teaching process does not automatically lead to the success of university education systems or the realization of educational goals; rather, it is the effective use of these tools that contributes to professors' effective teaching. Defining and measuring effective teaching is not an easy task because effective teaching requires two-way communication between the learner and the instructor. In order to teach, the instructor first pays attention to students' individual characteristics and growth levels, and accordingly, adopts teaching strategies. The literature review showed that higher education professors play a key role in the effectiveness of their teaching in the virtual space. This key role is initially observed by paying attention to students' wants and needs, and then by having knowledge of electronic tools and creating content. Therefore, examining university professors' opinions about the characteristics of effective teaching in virtual education is of paramount importance. Given professors' key role in holding virtual classes and their knowledge and understanding of the dimensions and components of effective teaching in virtual space, this study aims to identify the dimensions and skills necessary for effective teaching in virtual education based on the opinions of Tehran University professors.
Method: The qualitative research approach with a descriptive phenomenological method was selected for this study. Accordingly, the data were collected and analyzed using the Giorgi method, a criterion-based purposeful sampling method, and semi-structured interviews with eighteen participants. Giorgi analysis is a precise, clear, and step-by-step method that has five steps: familiarization with the data, identification of semantic units, regrouping of semantic units into clusters, conversion of semantic units into descriptive expressions, and combining and integrating them. To improve the credibility of the study, member checking, peer debriefing, external audit, thick description, and prolonged engagement were employed.
Results: The results of this study led to the identification and classification of four dimensions and twenty-one components to measure effective virtual teaching in universities. These include: 1) the individual dimension (with four components: a- the role of developers, b- the role of professors and their personality traits, c- the role of students and their personality traits, and d- individuals' professional development), 2) the skills, competencies, and abilities dimension (with eleven components: a- pedagogical skills of education, b- teaching skills, c- developing skills, d- knowledge of using electronic content, e- technology skills, f- professors' specialized competence and ability, g- communication skills, h- the skill of developing students' participation, i- psychological skills, j- the skill and ability to relate course materials to the needs of society and the market; the link between theory and practice, k- the ability to evaluate students in a virtual environment, k- classroom management skills), 3) the infrastructure, equipment, and facilities dimension (with two components: a- professors' and students' lack of access to digital tools and b- high-speed, stable Internet), and 4) contextual factors in effective teaching (including four components: a- the timing of classes, b- the role of the family, c- rules and regulations, and d- attention to professors' and students' physical and mental health).
Discussions and Conclusion: The findings emphasized the differences between the virtual platform and the face-to-face platform, the redefinition of the roles of developers, professors, and students in the virtual space, professors' and students' personality traits, the importance of professors' skills, competencies, and abilities, as well as the significance of infrastructure, equipment, facilities, and contextual factors. According to the results, it is suggested that professors use self-directed learning methods and professional learning groups based on cooperation and learning communities to improve their abilities in digital skills, digital literacy, digital thinking, technology, content production, and platform usage. Furthermore, in their teaching in virtual classes, professors should pay attention to creative communication and interactive methods, as well as the use of technological capacities to create psychological actions, especially enhancing learning motivation. They should also utilize digital facilities to provide feedback and assign various tasks to their students.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abdolmaleki, S., Maleki, H., & Asadi, F. (2018). Effective teaching component of teachers in curriculum planning.. Research in Curriculum Planning, 15(32), 95-114. [In Persian]
Abedini Beltork, M., Mansoori, S., & Kamali Ardakani. (2020). Identifying and leveling the factors influencing the effective teaching in universities of medical sciences based on interpretative structural modeling (case study: Shahid Sadoghi University of Medical Sciences). Quarterly Educational Development of Jundishapur, 11(2), 119-131. [In Persian]
Abirami, A. M., Pudumalar, S., & Pandeeswari, S. T. (2023). Designing an effective teaching learning environment for an undergraduate Software Engineering Course. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology (IJAET), 14(1), 1-21.
Allahyari, A., Arasteh, H. R., Ghorchian, N. G. & Reshadat Joo, H. (2022). Developing a model for facilitating the effectiveness of faculty members’ teaching. Journal of Applied Educational Leadership, 3(3), 35-48. [In Persian]
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
Askari, F. & Dehghani, M. (2023). Identifying the factors affecting the flipped teaching method in the higher education system based on the meta-synthesis approach. Journal of Curriculum Research, 12(2), 1-27. [In Persian]
Bagheri, Kh. (2019). Human agency: A religious and philosophical approach. Tehran: Vakavosh Publishing. [In Persian].
 
Barari, N., Rezaeizadeh, M., Khorasani, A., & Alami, F., (2020). Achievement of high goals in e-learning with comprehensive feedback (standards and criteria). Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(1), 85-96. [In Persian]
Bedeker, M. (2023). COVID-19 resulted in classrooms without walls: What can pedagogical and content knowledge (PCK) offer. Journal of Educators Online, 1-15.
Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 491-502.
Brown, G., & Edmunds, S. (2018). Effective teaching? In R. Ellis & H Hogard (Eds.), Handbook of quality assurance for university teaching (pp. 247-272). Routledge.
Clark, T., & Barbour, M. (Eds). (2023). Online, blended, and distance education in schools: Building successful programs. Taylor & Francis.
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96.
Deale, C. S. (2023). What can hospitality educators learn from students about effective teaching and learning at the beginning of an asynchronous, online class? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 1-20.
Dommett, E. J. (2023). Understanding the use of online tools embedded within a virtual learning environment. In Research Anthology on Remote Teaching and Learning and the Future of Online Education (pp. 821-839). IGI Global.
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2023). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531.
Garakani, N. & Dehghani, M. (2022). Identifying the dimensions and components of A study on the pedagogical aspects of virtual universities in Tehran, Educational Technology in Learning, 1(2), 83-97. [In Persian]
Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. (2017). Representation the characteristics of the successful professors in the virtual education in Iran's higher education system from the viewpoint of students and professors: A phenomenological study. Technology of Educational Journal, 11(43), 235-255. [In Persian]
Giorgi, A. (1989). One type of analysis of descriptive data: Procedures involved in following a scientific phenomenological method. Methods, 1(3), 39-61.
Giorgi, A. (2005). The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18(1), 75-82.
Groenewald, T. (2004) A Phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1) 1-26.
Hassni Jafari, F. & Abbasi, A. (2020). Comparison e-learning in self-regulatory learning strategy and educational motivation. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(1), 51-60. [In Persian]
Hosseini Sohi, M. S. (2019). Investigating the relationship between students' self-directed learning and the effectiveness of e-learning during the Corona crisis (case study: Tehran University graduate students), (Master's thesis). University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Huang, S. (2023). Service training: An e-learning training course for English teacher recruiters (Master’s thesis). California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
Iraj, H., Fudge, A., Faulkner, M., Pardo, A., & Kovanović, V. (2021, March). Understanding students' engagement with personalised feedback messages. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. 438-447.
Kaviani, H. & Nili, M. R. (2016). Meta-analysis of factors affecting effective teaching in medical education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 16(2), 9-20. [In Persian]
Khine, M. S., & Atputhasamy, L. (2005, May). Self-perceived and students’ perceptions of teacher interaction in the classrooms. In Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy and Practice, Singapore.
Koopman, O. (2015). Phenomenology as a potential methodology for subjective knowing in science education research. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 15(1), 1-10.
Kumar, R. (2020). Assessing higher education in the COVID-19 era. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(2), 37-41.
Kurni, M., Shaik Mohammed, M. S., & Srinivasa, K. G. (2023). AI-based online/e-learning platforms. In M. Kurni, M. S., Shaik Mohammed, & K. G. Srinivasa (Eds.), A beginner's guide to introduce artificial intelligence in teaching and learning (pp.137-159). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I., & Mcgill, L. (2008). Characterizing effective e-learning resources. Computers & Education, 50(3), 757-771.
Matthews, A., & Conley, M. (2023). Making space for the rabbit hole: Art education and eLearning development post-pivot. Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 1(4), 388-397.
Mmeremikwu-Fiac, C., & Onwukwe, V. E. (2018). Assessment of the extent of utilization of e-learning opportunities for effective teaching and learning in business education. Nigerian Journal of Business Education (NIGJBED), 3(2), 227-237.
Moradi, R. Mohamadi Mehr, M.; Nojoomi, F., & Khazaie, A. (2016). The use of design patterns in the design and production of electronic content in e-learning environment. Nama Journal of Educational Studies, 7, 41-52. [In Persian]
 Mseleku, Z. (2020). A literature review of e-learning and e-teaching in the era of Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(10), 588-597.
Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts–a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021.‏
Pozas, M., & Letzel, V. (2021). “Do you think you have what it takes?”–Exploring predictors of pre-service teachers’ prospective ICT use. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 823-841.
Ragan, & Schroeder, R. (2014). Supporting faculty success in online learning. In L. C. Ragan, T. B. Cavanagh, R. Schroeder, & K. Thompson (Eds.), Leading the e-learning transformation of higher education: Meeting the challenges of technology and distance education (pp. 108-131). Stulus Publishing.
Razzaghi, M. & Hashemi, S. A. (2018). The relationship between teachers' attituds towards the use of electronic content and educational technology with student learning. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 8(30), 23-40. [In Persian]
Reiners, G. M. (2012) Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing and Care. 1(5), 1-3.
Shvidko, E. (2020). Taking into account interpersonal aspects of teacher feedback: Principles of responding to student writing. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 4(2), 7.
Van Petegem, K., Aelterman, A., Van Keer, H., & Rosseel, Y. (2008). The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student’s wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 279-291.
Wang, Y. (2023). Where and what to improve? Design and application of a MOOC evaluation framework based on effective teaching practices. Distance Education, 44(4), 1-18.
Williams, V. R. (2023). Approaches to e-learning pedagogy. In P. C. Sharma, R. Bansal, & R. Singh (Eds.), Technology-driven e-learning pedagogy through emotional intelligence (pp. 1-13). IGI Global.
Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of Covid-19. Irish Educational Studies, 1-12

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 11 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 24 July 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics