Professional Learning Capacities of Primary School Teachers: From Individual Development to Networked Learning

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Introduction: Effective teaching is fundamental to a successful educational system, as the quality of an education system can never exceed the quality of its teachers. For this reason, educational systems must allocate substantial resources to cultivate a highly skilled teaching workforce (Minea et al., 2021). Traditionally, increasing teachers' specialized knowledge has been approached through external professional development programs (Darling-Hammond & Richardson, 2009). However, only a small portion of this externally gained expertise tends to transfer into everyday classroom practices (Veelen et al., 2017). As a result, traditional professional development approaches have shown limited effectiveness, prompting teachers to seek more self-directed opportunities to take ownership of their development (Nabhani & Bahous, 2010; Alhashmi & Moussa-Inaty, 2021). This shift underscores the importance of focusing on the contextual and school-based foundations of professional learning for teachers (Opfer & Pedder, 2011; Akiba, 2015), framing schools as critical learning environments not only for students but also for teachers (Hallinger et al., 2019). School leaders play a crucial role in advancing professional learning for both teachers and students by shaping school capacities through a supportive culture and engaged staff, ultimately leading to school-wide improvement (Li et al., 2016a; Hoy & Miskel, 2018). In Iran, key educational policy documents, such as Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, 2019), underscore the need to establish environments that facilitate the acquisition of professional knowledge and skills, as well as the development of teachers’ professional identities within educational settings. Research has also revealed significant criticisms of external, off-site professional learning programs and their limited impact on improving teacher quality (Darling-Hammond & Richardson, 2009; Ghaleei & Mohajeran, 2015; Orangi et al., 2011). In response, there is a growing emphasis on school-based professional learning and collaborative support among teachers (Cooper et al., 2020; Nabhani & Bahous, 2010; Alhashmi & Moussa-Inaty, 2021; Mortazi- Mehrbani & Gooya, 2014; Johnston & George, 2018; Netolicky, 2016; Veelen et al., 2017). Although Iran’s centralized educational structure and the restricted authority granted to school leaders pose challenges, recent studies suggest that schools in Iran possess untapped capacities that can directly and indirectly enhance teachers' professional learning. In elementary schools, for instance, teachers play a facilitative role in educating students across diverse subjects, necessitating expertise in foundational standards for core subjects (Porcell, 2020). This study draws on Horváth and colleague's (2015) diagnostic framework and builds upon Sleegers and colleague's (2013) multidimensional, multilevel professional learning community model, which explores learning capacities at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and network levels. By documenting teachers' lived experiences, this study aims to more deeply identify and illustrate the professional learning capacities among elementary school teachers. Through a qualitative approach, this study enhances the dissemination of teacher experiences and insights, contributing to a nuanced understanding of teachers' capacities for professional development within Iran’s educational context.
Method: The primary aim of this study was to identify the professional learning capacities of primary school teachers in Mashhad city. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to reach this goal. Using purposive sampling, 15 teachers and eight  primary school principals from three educational districts in Mashhad—each representing varying socio-economic and cultural profiles (affluent, semi-affluent, and less affluent)—were selected as key informants. Participants were chosen for their engagement in educational initiatives and plans at the district and regional levels. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, and analysis was conducted through open and axial coding. Themes were generated from 23 interviews and analyzed manually as well as with using MaxQDA (VERBI Software, 2020). To ensure data validity, each interview was transcribed and shared with the interviewee for review and feedback.
Results: The study’s findings revealed professional learning capacities across four levels: individual, interpersonal, organizational, and network. Individual capacities reflect teachers' ability to actively build knowledge in teaching, assess, evaluate, critique, and reconstruct their knowledge using available resources, highlighting intrinsic motivation, work commitment, self-directed learning, openness to ideas, feedback and reflective thinking, and a learning vision. Interpersonal capacities encompass teachers' abilities to collaborate toward shared school goals, including experience-sharing, collective learning, role-modeling, and acting as learning facilitators. Organizational capacities are embedded within structures that sustain processes for individual and collective learning and improvement, with essential capacities including a school climate that demands excellence, supportive culture, learning environment dynamism, access to educational resources, instructional media, educational initiatives, and organizational training. Notably, social networking emerged as a significant professional learning capacity at the network level. These findings contribute to understanding schools' capabilities and capacities in the field of education, offering valuable insights for enhancing professional learning in elementary schools across Iran.
Discussion and Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore a multi-layered approach to understanding professional learning capacities among primary school teachers, revealing the importance of capacities at individual, interpersonal, organizational, and network levels in creating a holistic professional learning environment. This framework illuminates the complex ways in which teachers cultivate and apply skills to improve their instructional practices, engage in meaningful collaboration, and foster a culture of continuous improvement within schools. This study offers valuable insights into the diverse capacities that support professional learning in Iran’s centralized educational system, particularly in elementary schools. The identified multi-level framework serves as a guide for educators, school leaders, and policymakers to enhance both teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. By supporting professional learning at these four distinct levels—personal, collaborative, structural, and networked—school leaders can cultivate a well-rounded professional learning ecosystem that responds to both individual teacher development needs and collective educational objectives. These findings suggest that a comprehensive, integrated approach to professional learning, incorporating self-directed development, collaborative engagement, supportive organizational structures, and broader network connectivity, has the potential to drive sustained improvements in teaching quality across Iran’s elementary schools.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 

Akiba, M. (2015). Measuring teachers’ professional learning activities in international context. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 27, 87-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000027003
Alhashmi, M., & Moussa-Inaty, J. (2021). Professional learning for Islamic education teachers in the UAE. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(3), 278-287.‏
Alzayed, Z. A., & Alabdulkareem, R. H. (2021). Enhancing cognitive presence in teachers’ professional learning communities via reflective practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 18-31.‏
Asadi, S., Hasani, M., Ghaleei, A., Rahmani, S,. Sheikhi, Z., & Ostovar, F (2017). Empowerment of teachers and organizational learning capacity of the school.  ContemporaryPsychology, 12(Suppl.), 132-137. [In Persian]
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
Baumfield, V. M., Hall, E., Higgins, S., & Wall, K. (2009). Catalytic tools: Understanding the interaction of enquiry and feedback in teachers’ learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 423-435.
Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: Mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 1-23.
Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of learning-centred leadership and teacher trust on teacher professional learning: Evidence from a centralised education system. Professional Development in Education, 1-13.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7(2), 548-556.
Carpenter, D. (2018). Intellectual and physical shared workspace: Professional learning communities and the collaborative culture. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 121-140.
Carter, R. S. (2017). A case study of the relationship between professional learning communities and teacher efficacy (Doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Oregon.
Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, A., Loughran, J., Phillips, M., & Smith, K. (2020). Understanding teachers’ professional learning needs: what does it mean to teachers and how can it be supported?. Teachers and Teaching, 26(7-8), 558-576.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.‏
Dayant, Z. (2020). The role of principals' educational leadership in predicting the professional learning of elementary school teachers in Mashhad (Master's thesis). Hekmat Razavi Institute of Higher Education. [In Persian]
De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Teacher learning in the context of teacher collaboration: connecting teacher dialogue to teacher learning. Research Papers in Education, 1-24.‏
De Jong, W. A., Lockhorst, D., de Kleijn, R. A., Noordegraaf, M., & van Tartwijk, J. W. F. (2022). Leadership practices in collaborative innovation: A study among Dutch school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 928-944.
Doğan, S., & Adams, A. (2018). Effect of professional learning communities on teachers and students: reporting updated results and raising questions about research design. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(4), 634-659.
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53-66.‏
Evers, A. T., Kreijns, K., & Van der Heijden, B. I. (2016). The design and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ professional development at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(2), 162-178.‏
Gall, M., Borg, W., & Gall, J. (2017/1396) Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology. Translated by Ahmadreza Nasr et al. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers' professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406-427.‏
Ghaleei, A., & Mohajeran, B. (2015). Examining the professional learning programs of primary school teachers and providing suggestions for improving their quality in Urmia city. The first Conference on Psychology, Educational and Social Sciences, Babol, Iran. [In Persian]
Hallinger, P., & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2020). Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high-and low-performing principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 595-616.‏
Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Piyaman, P. (2019). Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(3), 341-357.
Hallinger, P., Piyaman, P., & Viseshsiri, P. (2017). Assessing the effects of learning-centered leadership on teacher professional learning in Thailand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 464–476.
Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer.
Ho, D., & Lee, M. (2016). Capacity building for school development: current problems and future challenges. School Leadership & Management, 36(5), 493-507.‏
Horváth, L., Simon, T., & Kovács, A. (2015). Development and embedding of the horizontal learning system into the Hungarian institutional system of pedagogical service. In ATEE Annual Conference (pp. 24-26).‏
Hosseingholizadeh, R., Amrahi, A., & El-Farr, H. (2020). Instructional leadership, and teacher’s collective efficacy, commitment, and professional learning in primary schools: A mediation model. Professional Development in Education, 1-18.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2018/1397). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. Translated by Nader Soleimani et al. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Huang, Y. (2020). Effects of school organizational conditions on teacher professional learning in China: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100893.‏
Johnston, J., & George, S. (2018). A tool for capacity building: teacher professional learning about teaching writing. Teacher Development, 22(5), 685-702.
Karacabey, M. F., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Adams, D. (2020). Principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Turkish schools: Examining the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy and teacher trust. Educational Studies, 1-20.‏
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528.‏
Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter?. Journal of Educational Administration. 54, 661e682.
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016a). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100.
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2016b). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 20-42.
Livingston, K. (2012). Approaches to professional development of teachers in Scotland: pedagogical innovation or financial necessity?. Educational Research 54(2), 161-172.
Mei Kin, T., & Abdull Kareem, O. (2021). An Analysis on the implementation of professional learning communities in Malaysian secondary schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 192-206.
Mejang, A., & Suksawas, W. (2021). The impacts of a face-to-face training in combination with line application and professional learning communities on English teacher development. English Language Teaching, 14(4), 25-33.‏‏
Minea, A., Nusche, D., Sinnema, C., & Stoll, L. (2021). Teachers' professional learning study: Diagnostic report for the Flemish Community of Belgium. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7a6d6736-en
Mortazi Mehrbani, N., & Gooya, Z. (2014). Design a transitional model from professional development (pd) of secondary mathematics teachers in Iran to their professional learning (pl). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 9(34), 35-70. [In Persian]
Munro, J. (2005). Building the capacity for professional learning: A key component of the knowledge of effective school leaders in the twenty-first century. Seminar Series Paper 148, IARTV, Melbourne.
 
 
 
 
Nabhani, M., & Bahous, R. (2010). Lebanese teachers’ views on “continuing professional development”. Teacher Development, 14(2), 207-224.‏
Netolicky, D. M. (2016). Rethinking professional learning for teachers and school leaders. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(4), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-04-2016-0012
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.‏
Orangi, A., Gheltash, A., Shahamat, N., & Yosleyani, G. (2011). An investigation into the impact of in-service training on the professional performance of teachers of Shiraz. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2(5), 95-114. [In Persian]
Porcell, M. A. (2020). Veteran elementary teachers' perceptions about teacher professional development: A phenomenological study (Doctoral dissertation). Azusa Pacific University.
Qureshi, N. (2016). Professional development of teacher educators: Challenges and opportunities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick.
Rifai, Zh., Hasani, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Dimensions and components of teachers' professional learning community: A qualitative study, Journal of School Administration 8(1), 369-341. [In Persian]
Salo, P., Francisco, S., & Olin, A. (2024). Understanding professional learning in and for practice. Professional Development in Education, 1-16.
Sleegers, P., den Brok, P., Verbiest, E., Moolenaar, N. M., & Daly, A. J. (2013). Toward conceptual clarity: A multidimensional, multilevel model of professional learning communities in Dutch elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 118-137.‏
Spann, A. M. (2018). Teacher's description of multiple initiatives implementation: A phenomenological study (Doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Oregon.
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution (2019). Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) in the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
Talebizadeh, S. M., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100970.
Tayag, J., & Ayuyao, N. (2020). Exploring the relationship between school leadership and teacher professional learning through structural equation modeling. International Journal of Educational Management., 34(8), 1237-1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2018-0372
Thien, L. M., Liu, S., Yee, L. Q., & Adams, D. (2021). Investigating a multiple mediated-effects model of instructional leadership and teacher professional learning in the Malaysian school context: A partial least squares analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(4), 809-830. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211009892
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441-460.‏
Vanlommel, K., van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., Thesingh, J., & Kikken, È. (2023). How a sense of collective efficacy influences teacher learning during change: The role of academic optimism and shared vision. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 8(1), 1-16.
Veelen, R. V., Sleegers, P. J., & Endedijk, M. D. (2017). Professional learning among school leaders in secondary education: The impact of personal and work context factors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3),  365-408.
Voelkel Jr, R. H., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 505-526.
Studies in Learning & Instruction
Volume 16, Issue 2
September 2024
Pages 178-147

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 14 September 2024
  • Accept Date: 07 October 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics