Designing a Model of Teaching Competencies based on Teachers' Spatial Reasoning – A Meta Synthesis Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Introduction: Spatial thinking is a cognitive process that integrates concepts of space, representation tools, and reasoning processes. It serves as the foundation for spatial reasoning, which is defined as the ability to mentally manipulate objects and understand their relationships. To effectively utilize spatial reasoning, individuals must acquire and employ a set of related skills. Proficiency in spatial abilities significantly influences an individual's potential for academic achievement, particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) fields. Since understanding many STEM concepts involves comprehending and manipulating objects in space, STEM education necessitates a strong foundation in spatial reasoning skills.
One way to strengthen the connection between spatial cognition and STEM learning is through the spatialization of the curriculum. This approach involves designing new curricular materials and providing teacher training to enhance the spatial aspects of content, methods, and delivery. To achieve this, educators need to develop competencies related to spatial reasoning. Teachers must acquire skills that enable them to design and teach scientific concepts using spatial reasoning, allowing them to present scientific ideas in a more understandable and accessible manner to a diverse range of students with varying interests and abilities. Consequently, students can apply these skills to solve scientific problems and address real-world challenges.
Given the importance of spatial thinking and reasoning in formal education, along with the current lack of emphasis on their explicit teaching, this study aims to identify the professional competencies required of teachers to deliver instruction based on spatial reasoning. The goal is to support the professional development of educators and promote the development of spatial thinking and reasoning skills among students.
Method: Given the research objective of "identifying the professional competencies required of teachers for spatial reasoning-based instruction," a meta-synthesis approach was used to discover the desired competencies in this area. To this end, the seven-step meta-synthesis process of Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) was followed:
Step 1: Formulating the research question The primary research question was: What are the components of the professional competencies required of teachers in spatial reasoning-based instruction?
Step 2: Systematic literature search
Step 3: Screening and selecting suitable qualitative studies:  635 sources were found using the indicated keywords. Each source was carefully reviewed by researchers, 170 sources with less relevance to the research question were eliminated after reviewing the titles. Additionally,, after reviewing the abstracts, 182 sources were discarded, leaving 283 sources.
Step 4: Critically appraising studies and extracting data: In this step, the methodological quality of the studies was examined, and the CASP[1] tool, was used. As a result, 25 sources were eliminated due to receiving poor or very poor scores from the review process, and of the remaining 258 sources, 40 sources received a moderate score and 218 sources received a good or very good score.
Step 5: Analyzing and transforming the findings of qualitative studies: In this step, the 258 selected and finalized sources were reviewed multiple times to identify the separate intra-content findings that the original studies had found, and themes were extracted. To identify themes, the main research question was used as a criterion, and a total of 19 basic themes were extracted.
Step 6: Validating the findings: Optimization methods for the validity of the findings of this meta-synthesis were considered in four descriptive, interpretive, theoretical, and pragmatic stages.
Step 7: Presenting the findings: Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. All factors extracted from the research were considered as themes. These themes were categorized based on concepts related to the concept of competency in spatial reasoning-based instruction into 19 basic themes, 3 organizing themes, and 1 overarching theme. The basic concepts were placed under 3 organizing themes: knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for teaching using spatial reasoning. The "knowledge" competency included 10 basic themes such as familiarity with terminology related to spatial reasoning, knowledge of the dimensions and components of spatial reasoning, awareness of the history of spatial reasoning, knowledge of the typology of spatial reasoning, understanding the processes and variables affecting spatial reasoning, awareness of basic psychological theories and cognitive processes, familiarity with research on visual-spatial abilities, and more. Additionally, the "skills" competency included 5 themes: visual-spatial skills, spatial reasoning ability, spatial reasoning skills in science, the ability to apply different approaches to teaching with spatial reasoning, and spatial reasoning assessment skills. Finally, the "attitude" competency encompassed 4 themes, including a tendency towards critical spatial reasoning, interest in consciously practicing spatial thinking, a positive attitude and beliefs towards using spatial reasoning in teaching, and a positive attitude towards spatial reasoning-based curricula. All these themes were placed under the overarching theme of "competencies for teaching using spatial reasoning."
Discussions and Conclusion: The overall objective of this study was to investigate the competencies required of teachers for spatial reasoning-based instruction. The results showed that these competencies can be categorized into 19 basic themes, 3 organizing themes, and one overarching theme. Teachers or instructors who intend to use spatial reasoning in their teaching need to acquire and develop knowledge, skills, and attitudes in this area. These findings can be used as a basis for developing training programs and improving the quality of teaching in the field of spatial reasoning. This study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the competencies required for teachers to effectively integrate spatial reasoning into their instruction.
 
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Jankowski, P., Keim, D., Kraak, M.-J., MacEachren, A., & Wrobel, S. (2007). Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(8), 839–857.
Atit, K., Miller, D. I., Newcombe, N. S., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). Teachers’ spatial skills across disciplines and education levels: Exploring nationally representative data. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 130-137.‏
Atit, K., Shipley, T. F., & Tikoff, B. (2013). Twisting space: Are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills? Cognitive Processing, 14, 163-173.‏
Baker, T. R., Palmer, A. M., & Kerski, J. J. (2009). A national survey to examine teacher professional development and implementation of desktop GIS. Journal of Geography, 108(4–5), 174–185.
Bartlett, K. A., & Camba, J. D. (2023). Gender differences in spatial ability: A critical review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1-8.
Bates, K. E., Williams, A. Y., Gilligan‐Lee, K. A., Gripton, C., Lancaster, A., Williams, H.,... & Farran, E. K. (2023). Practitioners' perspectives on spatial reasoning in educational practice from birth to 7 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 571-590.‏
Bednarz, S. W., & Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 18-23.‏
Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402-414.‏
Bodzin, A. M. (2011). The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)‐supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 281-300.‏
Brinkmann, E. H. (1996). Programed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50(2), 179-184.
Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: what is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM, 47, 331-343.‏
Burte, H., Gardony, A. L., Hutton, A., & Taylor, H. A. (2020). Elementary teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about spatial thinking and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1-18.‏
Carbonell Carrera, C., & Bermejo Asensio, L. A. (2017). Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to develop spatial thinking. Cartography and Geographic Information science, 44(3), 259-270.‏
Chen, B., Xu, Z., Kirmani, S., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Florence, P.,... & Xia, F. (2024). Spatialvlm: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:2401.12168.
Dean, A. K. (2017, June). Applied Spatial Visualization for Engineers. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.‏
Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 536-542.‏
Gagnier, K. M., Atit, K., Ormand, C., & Shipley, T. F. (2012, November). Teaching Penetrative Thinking Via Progressive Alignment and Directed Sketching. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs (Vol. 44, No. 7, p. 180).
Gagnier, K. M., Holochwost, S. J., & Fisher, K. R. (2022). Spatial thinking in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Elementary teachers' beliefs, perceptions, and self‐efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 95-126.‏‏
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group.
Gersmehl, P. )2014(. Teaching geography (3rd Ed). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Gersmehl, P. J., & Gersmehl, C. A. (2007). Spatial thinking by young children: Neurologic evidence for early development and “educability”. Journal of Geography, 106(5), 181-191.
Gerson, H. B., Sorby, S. A., Wysocki, A., & Baartmans, B. J. (2001). The development and assessment of multimedia software for improving 3‐D spatial visualization skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9(2), 105-113.
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology press.
Gifford, S., Gripton, C., Williams, H., Lancaster, A., Bates, K. E., Williams, A. Y., Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Borthwick, A., & Farran, E. K. (2022). Spatial reasoning in early childhood.
Gilligan‐Lee, K. A., Bradbury, A., Bradley, C., Farran, E. K., Van Herwegen, J., Wyse, D., & Outhwaite, L. A. (2023). Spatial Thinking in Practice: A Snapshot of teacher's Spatial Activity Use in the Early Years' Classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(2), 107-116.‏
Golledge, R. G. (1993). Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 96, pp. 16-46). North-Holland.‏
Golledge, R. G., Marsh, M., & Battersby, S. (2008). Matching geospatial concepts with geographic educational needs. Geographical Research, 46(1), 85-98.
Goodchild, M. F. (2006). The fourth R? Rethinking GIS education. ESRI ArcNews, 28(3), 1-5.
Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75, 3-13.‏
Hauptman, H. (2010). Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0. Computers & Education, 54(1), 123-135.‏
Hegarty, M. (2014). Spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 14(2), 142-167.‏
Heiser, J., Tversky, B., & Jordan Hall, B. (2002). Mental models of complex systems: Structure and function. Manuscript submitted for publication.‏
Holton, G. (1986). Metaphors in science and education. G. Holton, The Advancement of Science, and its burdens, 229-252.
Hoskyns-Staples, L., & Blackmore, K. (2020). Collaborative problem-solving in primary mathematics: Developing shape and spatial awareness. Social and learning relationships in primary schools. Bloomsbury Monograph series, 9-30.
Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250-261.‏
Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2014). Dispositions toward teaching spatial thinking through geography: Conceptualization and an exemplar assessment. Journal of Geography, 113(5), 198-207.‏
Jo, I., & Hong, J. E. (2020). Effect of learning GIS on spatial concept understanding. Journal of Geography, 119(3), 87-97.‏
Jones, M. G., & Broadwell, B. (2008). Visualization without vision: students with visual. In Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education (pp. 283-294). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.‏
Kastens, K.A., & Ishikawa, T. (2006). Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the Earth (pp. 53-76).
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1831-1836.‏
Khine, M. S. (2017). Spatial cognition: Key to STEM success. Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice, 3-8.‏
Kim, M., Bednarz, R., & Kim, J. (2012). The ability of young Korean children to use spatial representations. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(3), 261-277.‏
Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2009). Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 183-198.‏
Lin, C. H., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Developing spatial visualization and mental rotation with a digital puzzle game at primary school level. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 23-30.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child development, 1479-1498.‏
Long, H. A., French, D. P., & Brooks, J. M. (2020). Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 31-42.
Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo‐spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
MacEachren, A. M. (2004). How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press.
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self‐efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369.
Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual‐spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33-54.‏
McArthur, J. M., & Wellner, K. L. (1996). Reexamining spatial ability within a Piagetian framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1065-1082.‏
McCormack, A. J. (1988). Visual/spatial Thinking: An Essential Element of Elementary Science. Council for Elementary Science International.
McCormack, A. J. (2017). Developing visual/spatial thinking in science education. In Science Education (pp. 143-156). Brill.‏
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1-10.
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). spatial thinking in physics: longitudinal impacts of 3-D spatial training. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 33, No. 33).‏
Milner-Bolotin, M., & Nashon, S. M. (2012). The essence of student visual–spatial literacy and higher order thinking skills in undergraduate biology. Protoplasma, 249, 25-30.‏
National Academies Press (US). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. National Academies Press.‏
National Research Council (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019.
Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29-35.‏
Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing relationships: Using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics, and social studies. American Educator, 37(1), 26–31
Newcombe, N. S. (2016). Thinking spatially in the science classroom. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1-6.‏
Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Harnessing spatial thinking to support stem learning. OECD Education Working Papers. OECD Publishing: Paris.
Newcombe, N. S. (2020). The puzzle of spatial sex differences: Current status and prerequisites to solutions. Child Dev. Perspect. 14, 251–257.
Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102-111.
Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2003). Models and maps. Making space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning, 145-177.‏
Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2014). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity (pp. 179-192). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.‏
Nielsen, C. P., Oberle, A., & Sugumaran, R. (2011). Implementing a high school level geospatial technologies and spatial thinking course. Journal of Geography, 110(2), 60-69.‏
Provo, J., Lamar, C., & Newby, T. (2002). Using a cross section to train veterinary students to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 10-34.
Rosenthal, K. (2021). Is gender equality still an issue? Gender (Im) balances in STEM. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 93(8), 1207-1209.
Šafhalter, A., Glodež, S., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2020). Development of spatial thinking abilities in engineering 3D modeling course aimed at lower secondary students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-18.‏
Sanandaji, A., Grimm, C., & West, R. (2017, September). Inferring cross-sections of 3D objects: a 3D spatial ability test instrument for 3D volume segmentation. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (pp. 1-4).‏
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
Saw, G., Chang, C. N., & Chan, H. Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525-531.
Sinton, D. S. (2017). Critical spatial thinking. the International Encyclopedia of Geography.
Small, M. Y., & Morton, M. E. (1983). Research in College Science Teaching: Spatial Visualization Training Improves Performance in Organic Chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13(1), 41-43.
Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(2). ‏
Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3‐D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480
Sorby, S., Drummer, T., Hungwe, K., & Charlesworth, P. (2005, June). Developing 3 D spatial visualization skills for non engineering students. In 2005 Annual Conference (pp. 10-428).
Stieff, M., Lira, M., & DeSutter, D. (2014). Representational competence and spatial thinking in STEM. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.‏
Supli, A. A., & Yan, X. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of augmented reality in enhancing spatial reasoning skills: A study on mental rotation, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization in primary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 351-374.
Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 147-181). Academic Press.‏
Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367-373.‏
Veurink, N. L., Hamlin, A. J., Kampe, J. C. M., Sorby, S. A., Blasko, D. G., Holliday-Darr, K. A.,... & Knott, T. W. (2009). Enhancing visualization skills-improving options and success (EnVİSIONS) of engineering and technology students. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 73(2), 1-17. ‏
Wai, J., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). Why Spatial Reasoning Matters for Education Policy. American Enterprise Institute.‏
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge olidifies its importance. Journal of Eucationa; Psychology, 101(4), 817-835. DOI: 10.1037/a0016127
Wakabayashi, Y., & Ishikawa, T. (2011). Spatial thinking in geographic information science: a review of past studies and prospects for the future. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 304-313.‏
Zhu, C., Leung, C. O. Y., Lagoudaki, E., Velho, M., Segura-Caballero, N., Jolles, D.,... & Klapwijk, R. (2023). Fostering spatial ability development in and for authentic STEM learning. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1138607
Studies in Learning & Instruction
Volume 16, Issue 2
September 2024
Pages 86-57

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 April 2024
  • Revise Date: 07 September 2024
  • Accept Date: 14 September 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics